Instant Checkmate
Criminal-record and social-profile search option.
View RecordsAssess a screening service through traceable sources, accurate matching and accessible corrections, using regulator guidance without treating a directory or review badge as an endorsement.
| Signal to check | Why it matters | What it does not prove |
|---|---|---|
| Regulator directory entry | CFPB company list can help identify a company and consumer-report contact path. | CFPB says the list is not independently verified, not all-inclusive and is not an endorsement or FCRA-status determination. |
| Intended-use statement | The provider should clearly state whether a product is designed for employment, tenant, credit or other eligibility use, or only informational people search. | A broad data product is not automatically lawful/appropriate for every eligibility decision. |
| Source disclosure | Look for a concrete description of jurisdictions, court/repository sources, update cadence and known exclusions. | A large “database” claim does not show that the needed court or repository was checked. |
| Consumer correction path | A regulated consumer-reporting workflow should make file access and dispute handling findable. | A customer-support form alone does not prove the underlying report is accurate. |
FTC guidance explains when screening reports are consumer reports and states that consumer reporting agencies must follow reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy. Confirm that the exact provider/product supports your intended regulated use.
A public-record or people-search product may be designed for informational research rather than an FCRA eligibility decision. Read its permitted-use terms and source coverage instead of assuming the product is interchangeable with employment screening.
If the goal is a certified court document, state repository response or fingerprint-based record, go to the issuing government source. A commercial report can help locate records but does not convert itself into an official certified record.
Does the service explain how it distinguishes same-name people and what identifiers it uses? False matches are a core risk in record aggregation.
Can you see which court, repository or public source supports a criminal-record item and the date it was checked?
Does the report separate arrest, charge, dismissal, pending case and conviction instead of collapsing them into one criminal label?
For consumer reports, CFPB guidance highlights rights and obligations around file access and dispute investigation. The route should be findable before a problem occurs.
A trustworthy comparison states what is not searched or not guaranteed. Unsupported “nationwide,” “instant” or “complete” claims should be treated cautiously unless the product defines them.
The CFPB list is useful as a starting directory, but CFPB expressly says it relies on company self-descriptions that it has not independently verified and does not make a determination about each company’s FCRA status or regulatory coverage. This guide therefore does not rank, endorse, rate or claim to have tested commercial background-check services. Compare a provider against the evidence criteria above and verify critical record items at the original official source.